Paper detail

Charge Multiplicity Asymmetry Correlation Study Searching for Local Parity Violation at RHIC for STAR

It has been suggested that local parity violation in QCD would lead to charge separation of quarks by the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) in heavy ion collisions. Charge separation could yield a dynamical charge multiplicity asymmetry with respect to the reaction plane. In this talk, we report results on charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au and d+Au collisions by the STAR experiment, as well as from the RHIC beam energy scan. We found that the correlation results could not be explained by CME alone. To gain further insights, we study our results as a function of the measured azimuthal angle range as well as the event-by-event anisotropy parameter $v_2$. The results indicate that the charge separation effect appears to be in-plane rather than out-of-plane. We found that the charge separation effect is proportional to the event-by-event $v_2$ and consistent with zero in events with $v_2 \approx 0$. Our studies suggest that the charge separation effect, within the statistical error, may be a net effect of event anisotropy and correlated particle production. Possible upper limit on the CME imposed by our data will be discussed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.