Paper detail

Charge migration in Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics and its relation to ageing, hardening and softening

The dielectric response of hard (Fe-doped) and soft (Nb-doped) rhombohedral Pb(Zr0.58Ti0.42)1-xMexO3 (PZT; Me= Fe or Nb) ceramics was studied at subswitching conditions over a wide range of temperatures (50 C to 450 C) and frequencies (10 mHz to 10 kHz). The results show qualitative differences in behavior of the acceptor and donor doped samples. Hard materials exhibit a steep increase of the complex permittivity with decreasing frequency. The onset of the dispersion is thermally activated with activation energy of about 0.6-0.8 eV and is attributed here to oxygen vacancy hopping. Activation energy for ac conductivity observed in soft materials is estimated to about 1.7 eV, corresponding to the half of the energy gap of Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 and is thus consistent with electronic conduction. The relevance of ionic hopping conductivity in hard materials to ferroelectric aging / deaging and hardening is analyzed. Strong ionic conductivity in hard and its absence in soft samples agree well with the dipolar mechanism of ageing in hard materials and the absence of significant ageing in soft materials.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.