Paper detail

Charge kinetics across a negatively biased semiconducting plasma-solid interface

An investigation of the selfconsistent ambipolar charge kinetics across a negatively biased semiconducting plasma-solid interface is presented. For the specific case of a thin germanium layer with nonpolar electron-phonon scattering, sandwiched between an Ohmic contact and a collisionless argon plasma, we calculate the current-voltage characteristic and show that it is affected by the electron microphysics of the semiconductor. We also obtain the spatially and energetically resolved fluxes and charge distributions inside the layer, visualizing thereby the behavior of the charge carriers responsible for the charge transport. Albeit not quantitative, because of the crude model for the germanium band structure and the neglect of particle-nonconserving scattering processes, such as impact ionization and electron-hole recombination, which at the energies involved cannot be neglected, our results clearly indicate (i) the current through the interface is carried by rather hot carriers and (ii) the perfect absorber model, often used for the description of charge transport across plasma-solid interfaces, cannot be maintained for semiconducting interfaces.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.