Paper detail

Charge coloration dynamics of electrochromic amorphous tungsten oxide studied by simultaneous electrochemical and color impedance measurements

The coloration mechanisms in electrochromic (EC) systems can be probed by comparing the dynamics of the electrical and optical responses. In this paper, the linear frequency-dependent electrical and optical responses of an amorphous tungsten oxide thin film were measured simultaneously by a combination of two techniques$\text{---}$that is, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and the so-called color impedance spectroscopy (CIS). This was done at different bias potentials, which can be associated with different intercalation levels. Equivalent circuit fitting to the EIS spectra was used to extract the Faradaic components participating in the total impedance response. The latter were assigned to an intermediate adsorption step before the intercalation and to the diffusion of the electron-ion couple in the film. A quantity denoted complex optical capacitance is compared to the complex electrical capacitance$\text{---}$in particular, their expressions are related to the Faradaic processes. The coloration at low intercalation levels followed both the adsorption and diffusion phenomena. Conversely, the diffusion contribution was dominant at high intercalation levels and the adsorption one seemed to be negligible in this case. For perfectly synchronized electrical and optical responses, their complex spectra are expected to differ only by a multiplying factor. This was the case at low intercalation levels, apart from small deviations at high frequencies. A clear departure from this behavior was observed as the intercalation level increased. A combination of frequency-dependent techniques, as presented in this work, can help in the understanding of the dynamics of the coloration mechanisms in EC materials at various conditions$\text{---}$for example, at different intercalation levels and optical wavelengths.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.