Paper detail

Characterizing the Mid-IR Extragalactic Sky with WISE and SDSS

The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) has completed its all-sky survey at 3.4-22 micron. We merge the WISE data with optical SDSS data and provide a phenomenological characterization of mid-IR, extragalactic sources. WISE is most sensitive at 3.4micron(W1) and least at 22micron(W4). The W1 band probes massive early-type galaxies out to z\gtrsim1. This is more distant than SDSS identified early-type galaxies, consistent with the fact that 28% of 3.4micron sources have faint or no r-band counterparts (r>22.2). In contrast, 92-95% of 12 and 22micron sources have SDSS optical counterparts with r<22.2. WISE 3.4micron detects 89.8% of the entire SDSS QSO catalog at SNR(W1)>7, but only 18.9% at 22micron with SNR(W4)>5. We show that WISE colors alone are effective in isolating stars (or local early-type galaxies), star-forming galaxies and strong AGN/QSOs at z<3. We highlight three major applications of WISE colors: (1) Selection of strong AGN/QSOs at z<3 using W1-W2>0.8 and W2<15.2 criteria, producing a census of this population. The surface density of these strong AGN/QSO candidates is 67.5+-0.14/deg^2. (2) Selection of dust-obscured, type-2 AGN/QSO candidates. We show that WISE W1-W2>0.8, W2<15.2 combined with r-W2>6 (Vega) colors can be used to identify type-2 AGN candidates. The fraction of these type-2 AGN candidates is 1/3rd of all WISE color-selected AGNs. (3) Selection of ULIRGs at z\sim2 with extremely red colors, r-W4>14 or well-detected 22micron sources lacking detections in the 3.4 and 4.6micron bands. The surface density of z~2 r-W4>14 ULIRGs is 0.9+-0.07/deg^2 at SNR(W4)>5 (flux(W4)>=2.5mJy), which is consistent with that inferred from smaller area Spitzer surveys. Optical spectroscopy of a small number of these high-redshift ULIRGs confirms our selection, and reveals a possible trend that optically fainter or r-W4 redder candidates are at higher redshifts.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.