Paper detail

Characterizing the mesh size of polymer solutions via the pore size distribution

In order to characterize the geometrical mesh size $ξ$, we simulate a solution of coarse-grained polymers with densities ranging from the dilute to the concentrated regime and for different chain lengths. Conventional ways to estimate $ξ$ rely either on scaling assumptions which give $ξ$ only up to an unknown multiplicative factor, or on measurements of the monomer density fluctuation correlation length $ξ_c$. We determine $ξ_c$ from the monomer structure factor and from the radial distribution function, and find that the identification $ξ=ξ_c$ is not justified outside of the semidilute regime. In order to better characterize $ξ$, we compute the pore size distribution (PSD) following two different definitions, one by Torquato et al. (Ref.1) and one by Gubbins et al. (Ref.2). We show that the mean values of the two distributions, $\langle r \rangle_T$ and $\langle r \rangle_G$, both display the behavior predicted for $ξ$ by scaling theory, and argue that $ξ$ can be identified with either one of these quantities. This identification allows to interpret the PSD as the distribution of mesh sizes, a quantity which conventional methods cannot access. Finally, we show that it is possible to map a polymer solution on a system of hard or overlapping spheres, for which Torquato's PSD can be computed analytically and reproduces accurately the PSD of the solution. We give an expression that allows $\langle r \rangle_T$ to be estimated with great accuracy in the semidilute regime by knowing only the radius of gyration and the density of the polymers.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.