Paper detail

Characterizing the Galactic White Dwarf Binary Population with Sparsely Sampled Radial Velocity Data

We present a method to characterize statistically the parameters of a detached binary sample - binary fraction, separation distribution, and mass ratio distribution - using noisy radial-velocity data with as few as two, randomly spaced, epochs per object. To do this, we analyze the distribution of DRVmax, the maximum radial-velocity difference between any two epochs for the same object. At low values, the core of this distribution is dominated by measurement errors, but for large enough samples there is a high-velocity tail that can effectively constrain the parameters of the binary population. We discuss our approach for the case of a population of detached white-dwarf (WD) binaries with separations that are decaying via gravitational wave emission. We derive analytic expressions for the present-day distribution of separations, integrated over the star-formation history of the Galaxy, for parametrized initial WD separation distributions at the end of the common-envelope phase. We use Monte Carlo techniques to produce grids of simulated DRVmax distributions with specific binary population parameters, and the same sampling cadences and radial velocity errors as the observations, and we compare them to the real DRVmax distribution to constrain the properties of the binary population. We illustrate the sensitivity of the method to both the model and the observational parameters. In the particular case of binary white dwarfs, every model population predicts a merger rate per star which can easily be compared to type-Ia supernova rates. In a companion paper, we apply the method to a sample of about 4000 WDs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and we find a merger rate remarkably similar to the rate of Type-Ia supernovae in Milky-Way-like galaxies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.