Paper detail

Characterizing the dynamical state of star clusters from snapshots of their spatial distributions

We determine the distribution of stellar surface densities, Σ, from models of static and dynamically evolving star clusters with different morphologies, including both radially smooth and substructured clusters. We find that the Σdistribution is degenerate, in the sense that many different cluster morphologies (smooth or substructured) produce similar cumulative distributions. However, when used in tandem with a measure of structure, such as the Q-parameter, the current spatial and dynamical state of a star cluster can be inferred. The effect of cluster dynamics on the Σdistribution and the Q-parameter is investigated using N-body simulations and we find that, depending on the assumed initial conditions, the Σdistribution can rapidly evolve from high to low densities in less than 5Myr. This suggests that the Σdistribution can only be used to assess the current density of a star forming region, and provides little information on its initial density. However, if the Σdistribution is used together with the Q-parameter, then information on the amount of substructure can be used as a proxy to infer the amount of dynamical evolution that has taken place. Substructure is erased quickly through dynamics, which can disrupt binary star systems and planets, as well as facilitate dynamical mass segregation. Therefore, dynamical processing in young star forming regions could still be significant, even without currently observed high densities.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.