Paper detail

Characterizing the breakdown of quasi-universality in the post-merger gravitational waves from binary neutron star mergers

The post-merger gravitational wave (GW) emission from a binary neutron star merger is expected to provide exciting new constraints on the dense-matter equation of state (EoS). Such constraints rely, by and large, on the existence of quasi-universal relations, which relate the peak frequencies of the post-merger GW spectrum to properties of the neutron star structure in a model-independent way. In this work, we report on violations of existing quasi-universal relations between the peak spectral frequency, f_2, and the stellar radius, for EoSs models with backwards-bending slopes in their mass-radius relations (such that the radius increases at high masses). The violations are extreme, with variations in f_2 of up to ~600 Hz between EoSs that predict the same radius for a 1.4 Msun neutron star, but that have significantly different radii at higher masses. Quasi-universality can be restored by adding in a second parameter to the fitting formulae that depends on the slope of the mass-radius curve. We further find strong evidence that quasi-universality is better maintained for the radii of very massive stars (with masses 2 Msun). Both statements imply that f_2 is mainly sensitive to the high-density EoS. Combined with observations of the binary neutron star inspiral, these generalized quasi-universal relations can be used to simultaneously infer the characteristic radius and slope of the neutron star mass-radius relation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.