Paper detail

Characterizing Quasars in the Mid-infrared: High Signal-to-Noise Spectral Templates

Mid-infrared (MIR) quasar spectra exhibit a suite of emission features including high ionization coronal lines from the narrow line region illuminated by the ionizing continuum, broad dust bumps from silicates and graphites, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features from star formation in the host galaxy. However, in Spitzer Infared Spectrograph (IRS) data, few features are detected in most individual spectra because of typically low signal-to-noise ratios (S/N). By generating spectral composites from over 180 IRS observations of Sloan Digital Sky Survey broad-line quasars, we boost the S/N and reveal features in the complex spectra that are otherwise lost in the noise. In addition to an overall composite, we generate composites in three different luminosity bins that span the range of 5.6 micron luminosities of 10$^{40}$--10$^{46}$ (erg~s$^{-1}$). We detect the high-ionization, forbidden emission lines of [SIV], [OIV], and [NeV] 14 micron in all templates and PAH features in all but the most luminous template. Ratios of lines with a range of ionization potentials show no evidence for a strong difference in the shape of the 41--97 eV ionizing continuum over this range of luminosities. The scaling of the emission-line luminosities as a function of continuum luminosity is consistent with what is expected, and shows no indication of a ``disappearing narrow-line region.'' The broad 10 and 18 micron silicate features in emission increase in strength with increasing luminosity, and a broad 3--5 micron black body consistent with graphite emission at 750 K is evident in the highest luminosity template. We find that the intrinsic quasar continua for all luminosity templates are consistent; apparent differences arise primarily from host galaxy contamination most evident at low luminosity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.