Paper detail

Characterizing Optimal Sampling of Binary Contingency Tables via the Configuration Model

A binary contingency table is an m x n array of binary entries with prescribed row sums r=(r_1,...,r_m) and column sums c=(c_1,...,c_n). The configuration model for uniformly sampling binary contingency tables proceeds as follows. First, label N=\sum_{i=1}^{m} r_i tokens of type 1, arrange them in m cells, and let the i-th cell contain r_i tokens. Next, label another set of tokens of type 2 containing N=\sum_{j=1}^{n}c_j elements arranged in n cells, and let the j-th cell contain c_j tokens. Finally, pair the type-1 tokens with the type-2 tokens by generating a random permutation until the total pairing corresponds to a binary contingency table. Generating one random permutation takes O(N) time, which is optimal up to constant factors. A fundamental question is whether a constant number of permutations is sufficient to obtain a binary contingency table. In the current paper, we solve this problem by showing a necessary and sufficient condition so that the probability that the configuration model outputs a binary contingency table remains bounded away from 0 as N goes to \infty. Our finding shows surprising differences from recent results for binary symmetric contingency tables.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.