Paper detail

Characterizing Interest Aggregation in Content-Centric Networks

The Named Data Networking (NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCN) architectures advocate Interest aggregation as a means to reduce end-to-end latency and bandwidth consumption. To enable these benefits, Interest aggregation must be realized through Pending Interest Tables (PIT) that grow in size at the rate of incoming Interests to an extent that may eventually defeat their original purpose. A thorough analysis is provided of the Interest aggregation mechanism using mathematical arguments backed by extensive discrete-event simulation results. We present a simple yet accurate analytical framework for characterizing Interest aggregation in an LRU cache, and use our model to develop an iterative algorithm to analyze the benefits of Interest aggregation in a network of interconnected caches. Our findings reveal that, under realistic assumptions, an insignificant fraction of Interests in the system benefit from aggregation, compromising the effectiveness of using PITs as an integral component of Content-Centric Networks.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.