Paper detail

Characterizing Foreground for redshifted 21-cm radiation: 150 MHz GMRT observations

Foreground removal is a major challenge for detecting the redshifted 21-cm neutral hydrogen (HI) signal from the Epoch of Reionization (EoR). We have used 150 MHz GMRT observations to characterize the statistical properties of the foregrounds in four different fields of view. The measured multi-frequency angular power spectrum C_l(Delta nu) is found to have values in the range 10^4 mK^2 to 2 x 10^4 mK^2 across 700 <= l <= 2 x 10^4 and Delta nu <= 2.5 MHz, which is consistent with model predictions where point sources are the most dominant foreground component. The measured C_l(Delta nu) does not show a smooth Delta nu dependence, which poses a severe difficulty for foreground removal using polynomial fitting. The observational data was used to assess point source subtraction. Considering the brightest source (~ 1 Jy) in each field, we find that the residual artifacts are less than 1.5% in the most sensitive field (FIELD I). We have used FIELD I, which has a rms noise of 1.3 mJy/Beam, to study the properties of the radio source population to a limiting flux of 9 mJy. The differential source count is well fitted with a single power law of slope -1.6. We find there is no evidence for flattening of the source counts towards lower flux densities which suggests that source population is dominated by the classical radio-loud Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN). The diffuse Galactic emission is revealed after the point sources are subtracted out from FIELD I . We find C_l \propto l^{-2.34} for 253 <= l <= 800 which is characteristic of the Galactic synchrotron radiation measured at higher frequencies and larger angular scales. We estimate the fluctuations in the Galactic synchrotron emission to be sqrt{l(l+1)C_l/2 pi} ~ 10 K at l=800 (theta > 10'). The measured C_l is dominated by the residual point sources and artifacts at smaller angular scales where C_l ~ 10^3 mK^2 for l > 800.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.