Paper detail

Characterizing Earth-like Planets Using a Combination of High-Dispersion Spectroscopy and High-Contrast Instruments: Doppler-shifted Water and Oxygen Lines

Future radial velocity, astrometric, and direct-imaging surveys will find nearby Earth-sized planets within the habitable zone in the near future. How can we search for water and oxygen in those nontransiting planets? We show that a combination of high-dispersion spectroscopic and coronagraphic techniques is a promising technique to detect molecular lines imprinted in the scattered light of Earth-like planets (ELPs). In this method, the planetary signals are spectroscopically separated from telluric absorption by using the Doppler shift. Assuming a long observing campaign (a 10-day exposure) using a high-dispersion spectrometer (R=50,000) with speckle suppression on a 30-m telescope, we simulate the spectra from ELPs around M dwarfs (whose stellar effective temperature is 2750-3750 K) at 5 pc. Performing a cross-correlation analysis with the spectral template of the molecular lines, we find that raw contrasts of $10^{-4}$ and $10^{-5}$ (using Y, J, and H bands) are required to detect water vapor at the 3 $σ$ and 16 $σ$ levels, respectively, for $T_\star$=3000 K. The raw contrast of $10^{-5}$ is required for a 6 $σ$ detection of the oxygen 1.27 $μ$m band. We also examine possible systematics, incomplete speckle subtraction, and the correction for telluric lines. When those are not perfect, a telluric water signal appears in the cross-correlation function. However, we find the planetary signal is separated from that resulting from the velocity difference. We also find that the intrinsic water lines in the Phoenix spectra are too weak to affect the results for water detection. We conclude that a combination of high-dispersion spectroscopy and high-contrast instruments can be a powerful means to characterize ELPs in the extremely large telescope era.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.