Paper detail

Characterizing anomalous diffusion in crowded polymer solutions and gels over five decades in time with variable-lengthscale fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

The diffusion of macromolecules in cells and in complex fluids is often found to deviate from simple Fickian diffusion. One explanation offered for this behavior is that molecular crowding renders diffusion anomalous, where the mean-squared displacement of the particles scales as $\langle r^2 \rangle \propto t^α$ with $α< 1$. Unfortunately, methods such as fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) or fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) probe diffusion only over a narrow range of lengthscales and cannot directly test the dependence of the mean-squared displacement (MSD) on time. Here we show that variable-lengthscale FCS (VLS-FCS), where the volume of observation is varied over several orders of magnitude, combined with a numerical inversion procedure of the correlation data, allows retrieving the MSD for up to five decades in time, bridging the gap between diffusion experiments performed at different lengthscales. In addition, we show that VLS-FCS provides a way to assess whether the propagator associated with the diffusion is Gaussian or non-Gaussian. We used VLS-FCS to investigate two systems where anomalous diffusion had been previously reported. In the case of dense cross-linked agarose gels, the measured MSD confirmed that the diffusion of small beads was anomalous at short lengthscales, with a cross-over to simple diffusion around $\approx 1~μ$m, consistent with a caged diffusion process. On the other hand, for solutions crowded with marginally entangled dextran molecules, we uncovered an apparent discrepancy between the MSD, found to be linear, and the propagators at short lengthscales, found to be non-Gaussian. These contradicting features call to mind the "anomalous, yet Brownian" diffusion observed in several biological systems, and the recently proposed "diffusing diffusivity" model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.