Paper detail

Characterizing and Mitigating Telluric Absorption in Precise Radial Velocities II: A Study of an M2 Type Star

Telluric absorption lines impact measuring precise radial velocities (RVs) from ground-based, high-resolution spectrographs. In this paper, we simulate the dependence of this impact on stellar spectral type and extend the work of the first paper in this series, which studied a G type star, to a synthetic M dwarf star. We quantify the bias in precise RV measurements in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) from the presence of tellurics in a simulated set of observations. We find that M dwarf RVs are more impacted by tellurics compared to G type stars. Specifically, for an M dwarf star, tellurics can induce RV errors of up to 16 cm/s in the red-optical and in excess of 220 cm/s in the NIR. For a G dwarf, comparable RV systematics are 3 cm/s in the red optical and 240 cm/s in the NIR. We attribute this relative increase for M dwarfs stars to the increased concordance in wavelength between telluric lines and stellar Doppler information content. We compare the results of our simulation to data collected on Barnard's star from the iSHELL spectrograph at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF). This study was conducted as a follow-up to the NASA probe mission concept study EarthFinder.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.