Characterizations of stabilizable sets for some parabolic equations in $\mathbb{R}^n$

We consider the parabolic type equation in $\mathbb{R}^n$: \begin{align}\label{equ-0} (\partial_t+H)y(t,x)=0,\,\,\, (t,x)\in (0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^n;\;\; \quad y(0,x)\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^n), \end{align} where $H$ can be one of the following operators: (i) a shifted fractional Laplacian; (ii) a shifted Hermite operator; (iii) the Schrödinger operator with some general potentials. We call a subset $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ as a stabilizable set for the above equation, if there is a linear bounded operator $K$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ so that the semigroup $\{e^{-t(H-χ_EK)}\}_{t\geq 0}$ is exponentially stable. (Here, $χ_E$ denotes the characteristic function of $E$, which is treated as a linear operator on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$.) This paper presents different geometric characterizations of the stabilizable sets for the above equation with different $H$. In particular, when $H$ is a shifted fractional Laplacian, $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is a stabilizable set if and only if $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is a thick set, while when $H$ is a shifted Hermite operator, $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is a stabilizable set for if and only if $E\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is a set of positive measure. Our results, together with the results on the observable sets for the above equation obtained in \cite{AB,Ko,Li,M09}, reveal such phenomena: for some $H$, the class of stabilizable sets contains strictly the class of observable sets, while for some other $H$, the classes of stabilizable sets and observable sets coincide. Besides, this paper gives some sufficient conditions on the stabilizable sets for the above equation where $H$ is the Schrödinger operator with some general potentials.

No reviews yet.

No comments yet.