Paper detail

Characterization of QUBO reformulations for the maximum $k$-colorable subgraph problem

Quantum devices can be used to solve constrained combinatorial optimization (COPT) problems thanks to the use of penalization methods to embed the COPT problem's constraints in its objective to obtain a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) reformulation of the COPT. However, the particular way in which this penalization is carried out, affects the value of the penalty parameters, as well as the number of additional binary variables that are needed to obtain the desired QUBO reformulation. In turn, these factors substantially affect the ability of quantum computers to efficiently solve these constrained COPT problems. This efficiency is key towards the goal of using quantum computers to solve constrained COPT problems more efficiently than with classical computers. Along these lines, we consider an important constrained COPT problem; namely, the maximum $k$-colorable subgraph (M$k$CS) problem, in which the aim is to find an induced $k$-colorable subgraph with maximum cardinality in a given graph. This problem arises in channel assignment in spectrum sharing networks, VLSI design, human genetic research, and cybersecurity. We derive two QUBO reformulations for the M$k$CS problem, and fully characterize the range of the penalty parameters that can be used in the QUBO reformulations. Further, one of the QUBO reformulations of the M$k$CS problem is obtained without the need to introduce additional binary variables. To illustrate the benefits of obtaining and characterizing these QUBO reformulations, we benchmark different QUBO reformulations of the M$k$CS problem by performing numerical tests on D-Wave's quantum annealing devices. These tests also illustrate the numerical power gained by using the latest D-Wave's quantum annealing device.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.