Paper detail

Characterization of optically-selected star forming knots in (U)LIRGs

(abridged)We present a comprehensive characterization of the general properties (luminosity functions, mass, size, ages, etc) of optically selected compact stellar objects (knots) in a representative sample of 32 low-z (U)LIRGs. We use ACS images from the Hubble Space Telescope in F435W and F814W bands. The galaxies in the sample represent different interaction phases and cover a wide luminosity range (11.46 \leq log (L_IR (Lsun)) \leq 12.54). With a median size of 32 pc, most of the nearly 3000 knots detected consists of complexes of star clusters. Some of the knots (~15%) are so blue that their colors indicate a young (i.e., < 30 Myr) and almost extinction-free population. There is a clear correlation of the mass of these blue knots with their radius, M \propto R^{1.91\pm0.14}, similar to that found in complexes of clusters in M51 and in Giant Molecular Clouds. This suggests that the star formation within the knots is proportional to the gas density at any given radius. The star formation of all the knots is characterized by luminosity functions (LFs) of the knots with slopes close to 2. Though, we see a marginally significant indication that the LF evolves with the interaction process, becoming steeper from early to advanced merger phases. Due to size-of-sample effects we are probably sampling knots in ULIRGs intrinsically more luminous (x4) than in less luminous systems. They also have sizes and are likely to have masses characteristic of clumps in galaxies at z \gtrsim 1. Knots in post-mergers are on average larger (x 1.3-2), more luminous (2 mag) in the I-band, and 0.5 mag redder than those in systems in earlier phases. Two scenarios are briefly discussed: (1) the likely presence of relatively high extinction in the most advanced mergers; (2) the dissolution of the less massive clusters and/or their coalescence into more massive, evolved superclusters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.