Paper detail

Characterization of Graph-cover Pseudocodewords of Codes over $F_3$

Linear-programming pseudocodewords play a pivotal role in our understanding of the linear-programming decoding algorithms. These pseudocodewords are known to be equivalent to the graph-cover pseudocodewords. The latter pseudocodewords, when viewed as points in the multidimensional Euclidean space, lie inside a fundamental cone. This fundamental cone depends on the choice of a parity-check matrix of a code, rather than on the choice of the code itself. The cone does not depend on the channel, over which the code is employed. The knowledge of the boundaries of the fundamental cone could help in studying various properties of the pseudocodewords, such as their minimum pseudoweight, pseudoredundancy of the codes, etc. For the binary codes, the full characterization of the fundamental cone was derived by Koetter et al. However, if the underlying alphabet is large, such characterization becom is more involved. In this work, a characterization of the fundamental cone for codes over $F_3$ is discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.