Paper detail

Characterization of galactic bars from 3.6 $μ$m S$^{4}$G imaging

We use the Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S$^{4}$G) 3.6 $μ$m imaging to study the properties (length and strength) and fraction of bars at $z=0$. We use the maximum of tangential-to-radial force ratio in the bar region ($Q_{\rm b}$) as a measure of the bar induced perturbation strength for a sample of $\sim 600$ barred galaxies. Bars are also characterized from the maximum of the normalized m=2 Fourier density amplitude ($A_{2}^{\rm max}$) and the bar maximum isophotal ellipticity ($\varepsilon$). Combining our force calculations with the HI kinematics from the literature we get an estimate of the halo-to-stellar mass ratios ($M_{\rm h}/M_{\ast}$) within the optical disk, which are in good agreement with studies based on weak lensing analysis, abundance matching and halo occupation distribution methods. By further using the Universal Rotation Curve models we obtain a first-order model of the rotation curve decomposition of $1128$ disk galaxies. We find that the dilution of $Q_{\rm b}$ by the halo becomes important for later types, implying $\sim 20-25\%$ reduction for $T = 7-10$. Whether the halo correction is included or not, the mean $Q_{\rm b}$ shows an increasing trend with $T$. Late-type bars are longer than previously found in the literature. We find possible evidence for the growth of bars within a Hubble time, as (1) bars in early-type galaxies show larger density amplitudes and disk-relative sizes than their intermediate-type counterparts, and (2) long bars are typically strong. We also observe two clearly distinct types of bars, between early and intermediate-type galaxies ($T<5$) on one side, and the late-type systems on the other, based on the differences in the bar properties. Most likely this distinction is connected to the larger halo-to-stellar ratio that we observe in later types, affecting the disk stability properties (Abridged).

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.