Paper detail

Characterization of diffuse X-ray emission from IGR~J17448-3232: an implication of a line of sight merging activity

Results of the spectral analysis for the galaxy cluster IGR J17448-3232 are presented. The intracluster medium (ICM) in the central region (r<300&#34;, 320 kpc) has a high electron temperature plasma of kTe~13-15 keV and an ionization temperature estimated from an intensity ratio of Fe XXVI Ly alpha/Fe XXV He alpha lines is lower than the electron temperature, which suggests that the ICM is in the non-ionization equilibrium (NEI) state. The spectrum in the central region can be also fitted with a two-component model: a two-temperature plasma model in a collisional ionization equilibrium (CIE) with temperatures of 7.9 keV and >34 keV or a CIE+power law model with a temperature of 9.4 keV and a photon index of 1.1. The two component models can represent the intensity ratio of Fe XXVI Ly alpha/Fe XXV He alpha lines. On the other hand, the spectrum in the outer region (r>300&#39;&#39;) can be explained by a single CIE plasma model with a temperature of 5-8 keV. Based on the spectral feature and its circular structure, we propose that the NEI plasma was produced by merging along the line-of-sight direction.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.