Paper detail

Characterization of blood pressure and heart rate oscillations of POTS patients via uniform phase empirical mode decomposition

Objective: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is associated with the onset of tachycardia upon postural change. The current diagnosis involves the measurement of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) during head-up tilt (HUT) or active standing test. A positive diagnosis is made if HR changes with more than 30 bpm (40 bpm in patients aged 12-19 years), ignoring all of the BP and most of the HR signals. This study examines 0.1 Hz oscillations in systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP) and HR signals providing additional metrics characterizing the dynamics of the baroreflex. Methods: We analyze data from 28 control subjects and 28 POTS patients who underwent HUT. We extract beat-to-beat HR and SBP during a 10 min interval including 5 minutes of baseline and 5 minutes of HUT. We employ Uniform Phase Empirical Mode Decomposition (UPEMD) to extract 0.1 Hz stationary modes from both signals and use random forest machine learning and k-means clustering to analyze the outcomes. Results show that the amplitude of the 0.1 Hz oscillations is higher in POTS patients and that the phase response between the two signals is shorter (p < 0.005). Conclusion: POTS is associated with an increase in the amplitude of SBP and HR 0.1 Hz oscillation and a shortening of the phase between the two signals. Significance: The 0.1 Hz phase response and oscillation amplitude metrics provide new markers that can improve POTS diagnostic augmenting the existing diagnosis protocol only analyzing the change in heart rate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.