Paper detail

Characterization of atmospheric pressure plasma plume

In order to optimize the parameters of the plasma plume for atmospheric pressure plasma applications such as biological and industrial applications, it is highly necessary to thoroughly understand its characteristics. In this paper, various diagnostic techniques are discussed to characterize the atmospheric pressure plasma plume. The major emphasis of this work is to utilize possibly simple methods, low complexity in post data analysis and obtain in-situ information. The parameters of the plasma plume such as spatial variation of gas temperature, electron excitation temperature, plume velocity, plume current, electron density are experimentally measured. In addition, plasma discharge behavior and plume formation with various gas flow rates and applied voltage are studied. The characterization of the above parameters is carried out by using electrical diagnostics (voltage probe and a current sensor), Optical diagnostics (optical emission spectroscopy (OES), fast imaging method using ICCD camera), and thermocouple. The plasma plume/gas temperature along the plume length is measured by using a simple K-type thermocouple and is found to be in the range of (42.5 - 24.5) deg C. The OES is used to estimate the electron excitation temperature of plasma plume and to identify the key reactive species (OH, NO, N2+, O, etc.) present in the plume. ICCD camera is utilized to capture the temporal evolution of plasma and to estimate the plume velocity along the plume length. The current transformer is utilized to measure the plume current along the plume length. By using the velocity and current information, the plasma density is evaluated, and the obtained values are in the range of (0.069-5.96)x 10^12 cm^-3. The above range of parameters and tunable nature of our designed plasma source will be useful for the development and optimization of plasma sources for various applications.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.