Paper detail

Characteristics and Evolution of the Magnetic field and Chromospheric Emission in an Active Region Core Observed by Hinode

We describe the characteristics and evolution of the magnetic field and chromospheric emission in an active region core observed by the Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode. Consistent with previous studies, we find that the moss is unipolar, the spatial distribution of magnetic flux evolves slowly, and the magnetic field is only moderately inclined. We show that the field line inclination and horizontal component are coherent, and that the magnetic field is mostly sheared in the inter-moss regions where the highest magnetic flux variability is seen. Using extrapolations from SP magnetograms we show that the magnetic connectivity in the moss is different than in the quiet Sun because most of the magnetic field extends to significant coronal heights. The magnetic flux, field vector, and chromospheric emission in the moss also appear highly dynamic, but actually show only small scale variations in magnitude on time-scales longer than the cooling times for hydrodynamic loops computed from our extrapolations, suggesting high-frequency (continuous) heating events. Some evidence is found for flux (Ca 2 intensity) changes on the order of 100--200 G (DN) on time-scales of 20--30 mins that could be taken as indicative of low-frequency heating. We find, however, that only a small fraction (10%) of our simulated loops would be expected to cool on these time-scales, and we find no clear evidence that the flux changes consistently produce intensity changes in the chromosphere. The magnetic flux and chromospheric intensity in most individual SOT pixels in the moss vary by less than ~ 20% and ~ 10%, respectively, on loop cooling time-scales. In view of the high energy requirements of the chromosphere, we suggest that these variations could be sufficient for the heating of `warm' EUV loops, but that the high basal levels may be more important for powering the hot core loops rooted in the moss.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.