Paper detail

Characteristic quasi-polynomials of truncated arrangements

Given an (affine) integral arrangement $\mathcal{A}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, the reduction of $\mathcal{A}$ modulo an arbitrary positive integer $q$ naturally yields an arrangement $\mathcal{A}_q$ in $\mathbb{Z}_q^n$. Our primary objective is to study the combinatorial aspects of the restriction $\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)}$ to the solution space of $B\bm x=\bm b$, and its reduction $\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}$ modulo $q$. This work generalizes the earlier results of Kamiya, Takemura and Terao, as well as Chen and Wang. The purpose of this paper is threefold as follows. Firstly, we derive an explicit counting formula for the cardinality of the complement $M\big(\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}\big)$ of $\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}$; and prove that for all positive integers $q>q_0$, this cardinality coincides with a quasi-polynomial $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},q\big)$ in $q$ with a period $ρ_C$. Secondly, we weaken Chen and Wang's original hypothesis $a \mid b$ to a strictly more general condition $\gcd(a,ρ_C)\mid \gcd(b,ρ_C)$, and introduce the concept of combinatorial equivalence for positive integers. Within this framework, we establish three unified comparison relations: between the unsigned coefficients of $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},a\big)$ and $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},b\big)$; between the unsigned coefficients of distinct constituents of $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},q\big)$; and between the cardinalities of $M\big(\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}\big)$ and $M\big(\mathcal{A}_{pq}^{(B,\bm b)}\big)$. Thirdly, using our method, we revisit the enumerative aspects of group colorings and nowhere-zero nonhomogeneous form flows from the early work of Forge, Zaslavsky and Kochol.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.