Paper detail

Characterising Atmospheres of Cloudy Temperate Mini-Neptunes with JWST

The upcoming James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) promises a generational shift in the study of temperate mini-Neptune atmospheres using transit spectroscopy. High-altitude clouds however threaten to impede their atmospheric characterisation by muting spectral features. In this study, we systematically investigate JWST instrument configurations for characterising cloudy mini-Neptune atmospheres, assessing the importance of instrument choice and wavelength coverage, focusing on NIRISS and NIRSpec. We consider two temperate mini-Neptunes orbiting nearby M dwarfs, K2-18 b and TOI-732 c, with equilibrium temperatures below 400 K, as case studies and assess observations using different instrument configurations with one transit per instrument. We find that their JWST transmission spectra with modest observing time and adequate wavelength coverage can provide precise abundance constraints of key molecules H2O, CH4, and NH3 even in the presence of clouds at significantly high altitudes. The best constraints are obtained by combining all three high-resolution NIRSpec gratings (G140H+G235H+G395H) that together span the ~1-5 $μ$m range. Single-transit observations with this three-instrument configuration allow precise abundance constraints for cloud-top pressures as low as 3 mbar and 0.1 mbar for K2-18 b and TOI-732 c, respectively, assuming a nominal 10x solar metallicity. The constraints vary with instrument combinations. We find that NIRSpec G235H+G395H is the optimal two-instrument configuration, while NIRISS or NIRSpec G235H is optimal for single-instrument observations. Absent high-altitude clouds, even single-instrument observations can provide good abundance constraints for these planets. Our findings underscore the promise of JWST transmission spectroscopy for characterising temperate mini-Neptunes orbiting nearby M dwarfs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.