Paper detail

Characterisation of the non-Gaussianity of radio and IR point-sources at CMB frequencies

This study, using publicly available simulations, focuses on the characterisation of the non-Gaussianity produced by radio point sources and by infrared (IR) sources in the frequency range of the cosmic microwave background from 30 to 350 GHz. We propose a simple prescription to infer the angular bispectrum from the power spectrum of point sources considering independent populations of sources, with or without clustering. We test the accuracy of our prediction using publicly available all-sky simulations of radio and IR sources and find very good agreement. We further characterise the configuration dependence and the frequency behaviour of the IR and radio bispectra. We show that the IR angular bispectrum peaks for squeezed triangles and that the clustering of IR sources enhances the bispectrum values by several orders of magnitude at scales l \sim 100. At 150 GHz the bispectrum of IR sources starts to dominate that of radio sources on large angular scales, and it dominates over the whole multipole range at 350 GHz. Finally, we compute the bias on f_NL induced by radio and IR sources. We show that the positive bias induced by radio sources is significantly reduced by masking the sources. We also show, for the first time, that the form of the IR bispectrum mimics a primordial 'local' bispectrum f_NL. The IR sources produce a negative bias which becomes important for Planck-like resolution and at high frequencies (Delta f_NL ~ -6 at 277 GHz and Delta f_NL \sim -60-70 at 350 GHz). Most of the signal being due to the clustering of faint IR sources, the bias Delta f_NL^IR is not reduced by masking sources above a flux limit and may, in some cases, even be increased due to the reduction of the shot-noise term.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.