Paper detail

Characterisation of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Photometry

We study the photometric properties of stars in the data archive of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), the prime aim being to understand the photometric calibration over the entire data set. It is confirmed that the photometric calibration for point sources has been made overall tightly against the SDSS standard stars. We have also confirmed that photometric synthesis of the SDSS spectrophotometric data gives broad band fluxes that agree with broad band photometry with errors no more than 0.04 mag and little tilt along the wide range of colours, verifying that the response functions of the SDSS 2.5 m telescope system are well characterised. We locate stars in the SDSS photometric system, so that stars can roughly be classified into spectral classes from the colour information. We show how metallicity and surface gravity affect colours, and that stars contained in the SDSS general catalogue, plotted in colour space, show the distribution that matches well with what is anticipated from the variations of metallicity and surface gravity. The colour-colour plots are perfectly consistent among the three samples, stars in the SDSS general catalogue, SDSS standard stars and spectrophotometric stars of Gunn & Stryker, especially when some considerations are taken into account of the differences (primarily metallicity) of the samples. We show that the g-r - inverse temperature relation is tight and can be used as a good estimator of the effective temperature of stars over a fairly wide range of effective temperatures. We also confirm that the colours of G2V stars in the SDSS photometric system match well with the Sun.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.