Paper detail

Character Values of Stanley Sequences

Stanley and Odlyzko proposed a method for greedily constructing sets with no 3-term arithmetic progressions. It is conjectured that there is a dichotomy between such sequences: those that have a periodic structure as the sequence satisfies certain recurrence relations while others appear to be chaotic. One large class of sequences that have these periodic behaviors are known as independent sequences that have two parameters, a character and a growth factor. It was conjectured by Rolnick that all but a finite set of integers can be achieved as characters of a independent sequences. Previously the only large class of integers known to be characters where those with base 3 representations consisting solely of the digits 0 and 2. This paper dramatically improves this result by demonstrating that all even integers not congruent to 244 mod 486 can be achieved as characters, therefore demonstrating that the set of all characters has a positive lower density.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.