Paper detail

Chapman-Enskog derivation of multicomponent Navier-Stokes equations

There are several reasons to extend the presentation of Navier-Stokes equations to multicomponent systems. Many technological applications are based on physical phenomena that are present neither in pure elements nor in binary mixtures. Whereas Fourier's law must already be generalized in binaries, it is only with more than two components that Fick's law breaks down in its simple form. The emergence of dissipative phenomena affects also the inertial confinement fusion configurations, designed as prototypes for the future fusion nuclear plants hopefully replacing the fission ones. This important topic can be described in much simpler terms than in many textbooks since the publication of the formalism put forward recently by Snider in \textit{Phys. Rev. E} \textbf{82}, 051201 (2010). In a very natural way, it replaces the linearly dependent atomic fractions by the independent set of partial densities. Then, the Chapman-Enskog procedure is hardly more complicated for multicomponent mixtures than for pure elements. Moreover, the recent proposal of a convergent kinetic equation by Baalrud and Daligault in \textit{Phys. Plasmas} \textbf{26}, 082106 (2019) demonstrates that Boltzmann equation with the potential of mean force is a far better choice in situations close to equilibrium, as described by the Navier-Stokes equations, than Landau or Lenard-Balescu equations. In our comprehensive presentation, we emphasize the physical arguments behind Chapman-Enskog derivation and keep the mathematics as simple as possible. This excludes as a technical non-essential aspect the solution of the linearized Boltzmann equation through an expansion in Hermite polynomials. We discuss the link with the second principle of Thermodynamics of entropy increase, and what can be learned from this exposition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.