Paper detail

Chaotic flavor evolution in an interacting neutrino gas

Neutrino-neutrino refraction can lead to non-periodic flavor oscillations in dense neutrino gases, and it has been hypothesized that some solutions are chaotic in nature. This is of particular interest in the case of neutrino emission from core-collapse supernovae where the measurement of the spectral shape for different flavors can provide crucial information about both neutrino physics and the physical conditions close to the proto-neutron star. Whether a system is chaotic or not can be assessed by the Lyapunov exponents which quantify the rate of divergence of nearby trajectories in the system. We have done a numerical case study for a simple toy model of two neutrino flavors with two momentum states traveling against each other which is known to exhibit flavor transition instabilities. We find the leading Lyapunov exponent to be positive in all cases, confirming the chaoticity of the system for both the normal and the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy. However, more Lyapunov exponents were approximately zero in the inverted hierarchy compared to the normal which has implications for the stability of the system. To investigate this, we have calculated a generalized set of normal modes, the so-called covariant Lyapunov vectors. The covariant Lyapunov vectors associated with vanishing Lyapunov exponents showed the existence of marginally stable directions in phase space for some cases. While our analysis was done for a toy model example, it should work equally well for more realistic cases of neutrinos streaming from a proto-neutron star and provide valuable insight into the nature of the flavor instability. We finally stress that our approach captures many more properties of the physical system than the linear stability analyses which have previously been performed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.