Paper detail

Changing Supercycle of the ER UMa-Type Star V1159 Ori

We examined the VSNET light curve of the ER UMa-type star V1159 Ori. We detected a large variation of the supercycle (the interval between successive superoutbursts) between extremes of 44.6 and 53.3 d. The outburst activity was also found to decrease when the supercycle was long. The observed variation of the supercycle corresponds to a variation of ~40 % of the mass-transfer rate from the secondary star, totally unexpected for this class of objects. We also detected a hint of ~1800 d periodicity in the variation, whose period is close to what has been suggested for solar-type cycles for cataclysmic variables (CVs). If this periodicity is caused by the magnetic activity of the secondary star, this detection constitutes the first clear evidence of continuing magnetic activity in CV evolution, even after crossing the period gap. This activity may partly explain still poorly understood origins of the high mass-transfer rates in ER UMa-type stars.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.