Paper detail

Chandra Survey of Nearby Highly Inclined Disc Galaxies - II: Correlation Analysis of Galactic Coronal Properties

X-ray observations provide a key tool for exploring the properties of galactic coronae and their formation processes. In an earlier paper, we have presented a Chandra data analysis of the coronae of 53 nearby highly-inclined disc galaxies. Here we study the correlation of the X-ray measurements with other galaxy properties and compare the results with those obtained for elliptical galaxies. A good correlation is present between the coronal luminosity Lx and the SFR. But we find a better correlation between Lx and the total SN mechanical energy input rate (ESN), including the expected contribution from core collapsed (CC) and Ia SNe. The X-ray radiation efficiency (eta=Lx/ESN) has a mean value of ~0.4% with an rms of ~0.5dex. eta further correlates with MTF/M* (MTF is the baryon mass measured from the rotation velocity and the Tully-Fisher relation, M* is the stellar mass measured from the K-band luminosity) and the CC SN rate surface density (FSN, in units of SN/yr/kpc^2), which can be characterized as: eta=0.41%MTF/M* and eta=1.4%FSN^-0.3. These correlations reflect the roles played by the gravitational mass and energetic feedback concentrations in determining eta. The characteristic temperature of the corona shows little dependence on the total or specific SFR, the cold gas content, or Lx. The coronae of disc galaxies tend to be more X-ray luminous, hotter, and lower in Fe/O abundance ratio than those of elliptical ones of similar masses. Early-type non-starburst disc galaxies tend to be more Fe-rich, while starburst ones have a roughly constant abundance ratio of Fe/O~0.36solar. Our results are consistent with the coronal gas being mainly provided by stellar feedback in a mass range of M*~10^{8.7-11}Msun. In addition, processes such as charge exchange at cool/hot gas interfaces, as well as various environmental effects, are also needed to explain the diversity of coronal properties.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.