Paper detail

Chandra observations of the galaxy group AWM 5: cool core re-heating and thermal conduction suppression

We present an analysis of a 40 ksec Chandra observation of the galaxy group AWM 5. It has a small ($\sim8$ kpc) dense cool core with a temperature of $\sim1.2$ keV and the temperature profile decreases at larger radii, from $\sim3.5$ keV just outside the core to $\sim2$ keV at $\sim300$ kpc from the center. The abundance distribution shows a "hole" in the central $\sim10$ kpc, where the temperature declines sharply. An abundance of at least a few times solar is observed $\sim15-20$ kpc from the center. The deprojected electron density profile shows a break in slope at $\sim13$ kpc and can be fit by two $β$-models, with $β=0.72_{-0.11}^{+0.16}$ and $r_c=5.7_{-1.5}^{+1.8}$ kpc, for the inner part, and $β=0.34\pm0.01$ and $r_c=31.3_{-5.5}^{+5.8}$ kpc, for the outer part. The mass fraction of hot gas is fairly flat in the center and increases for $r>30$ kpc up to a maximum of $\sim6.5%$ at $r\sim380$ kpc. The gas cooling time within the central 30 kpc is smaller than a Hubble time, although the temperature only declines in the central $\sim8$ kpc region. This discrepancy suggests that an existing cooling core has been partially re-heated. In particular, thermal conduction could have been a significant source of re-heating. In order for heating due to conduction to balance cooling due to emission of X-rays, the conductivity must be suppressed by a large factor (at least $\sim100$). Past AGN activity (still visible as a radio source in the center of the group) is however the most likely source that re-heated the central regions of AWM 5.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.