Paper detail

Chandra observations of SGR 1627-41 near quiescence

We report on an observation of SGR 1627-41 made with the Chandra X-ray Observatory on 2011 June 16. Approximately three years after its outburst activity in 2008, the source's flux has been declining, as it approaches its quiescent state. For an assumed power-law spectrum, we find that the absorbed 2--10 keV flux for the source is $1.0^{+0.3}_{-0.2} \times 10^{-13} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}$ with a photon index of $2.9 \pm 0.8$ ($N_H=1.0\times10^{23}$ cm^{-2}). This flux is approximately consistent with that measured at the same time after the source's outburst in 1998. With measurements spanning 3 years after the 2008 outburst, we analyze the long-term flux and spectral evolution of the source. The flux evolution is well described by a double exponential with decay times of 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1 and 59 $\pm$ 6 days, and a thermal cooling model fit suggests that SGR 1627-41 may have a hot core ($T_c ~ 2\times 10^8$ K). We find no clear correlation between flux and spectral hardness as found in other magnetars. We consider the quiescent X-ray luminosities of magnetars and the subset of rotation-powered pulsars with high magnetic fields ($B >~ 10^{13}$ G) in relation to their spin-inferred surface magnetic-field strength, and find a possible trend between the two quantities.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.