Paper detail

Chandra observations of AGN-candidates correlated with Auger UHECRs

The Auger observatory has observed a possible correlation between Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECRs) above 57 EeV and nearby candidate Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) from the Veron-Cetty Veron catalog (VCV). In this paper we report on Chandra X-ray observations of 10 unconfirmed VCV AGN-candidates and luminous IR galaxies correlating with the first set of Auger UHECRs, to determine whether or not they have active nuclei. The X-ray data, when combined with optical luminosities, show that in fact none of the 10 galaxies have a significant AGN component; if there is any nuclear activity at all, it is weak rather than obscured. This reduces the number of UHECRs in the original Auger dataset possibly correlating with AGNs from 20 of 27 down to 14 of 27. We also used Chandra to measure the X-ray luminosity of ESO 139-G12, an AGN which correlates with 2 of the Auger UHECRs, to obtain the first estimate of its bolometric luminosity; this completes the determination of the bolometric luminosities of all correlating AGNs. Taking our results into account, only one of the 27 UHECRs in the original Auger data-release is correlated on a few-degree angular scale with an identified AGN that is powerful enough in its steady-state to accelerate protons to the observed energies, according to conventional acceleration mechanisms. Intriguingly, approximately 60% of the UHECRs with $|b|>10^\circ$ do correlate with genuine AGNs, but these are too weak to meet the acceleration criterion for protons; this may be an indication that AGNs experience transient high-luminosity states which can accelerate UHECRs. To determine the source(s) and composition of UHECRs through statistical correlation studies requires reliable, complete and uniform catalogs of identified AGNs; our a posteriori inspection of ambiguous source candidates underscores the inadequacies of the VCV catalog in this respect.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.