Paper detail

Chandra Observations of Abell 2029: The Dark Matter Profile Down to <0.01 R_vir in an Unusually Relaxed Cluster

We have used a high resolution Chandra observation to examine the core mass distribution of the unusually regular cD cluster Abell 2029. This system is especially well-suited for analysis of its mass distribution under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium: it exhibits an undisturbed X-ray morphology and a single-phase ICM. We estimate the total mass, and the contributions of the gas and dark matter components from <3 arcsec to ~3 arcmin (<4.4-260 kpc, 0.001-0.1 r_vir). The gas density is well fitted by either a double beta-model, or a ``cusped'' beta-model. The temperature data are increasing, and can be approximated by a power-law, with alpha_T = 0.27+/-0.01. Fitting smooth functions to density and T, we obtain a mass profile, which is remarkably well described down to 0.002 r_vir by the NFW model, for which we measure r_scale = 540+/-90 kpc (~0.2 r_vir) and c = 4.4 +/- 0.9. The mass profile is also approximated by a power-law fit with alpha_m = 1.81+/-0.04 (corresponding to a logarithmic density slope of -1.19+/-0.04). The density profile is too shallow to be fitted with a Moore et al. model. The consistency with NFW at <0.01 r_vir is incompatible with SIDM, and contrasts with the results from rotation curves of LSB and dwarf galaxies. This suggests that while CDM may adequately describe clusters, it does not currently account properly for small halos. Using the cD light, we observe a total M/L_V ~ 12 at r < 20 kpc, rising to > 100 beyond 200 kpc. The consistency with an NFW halo model and the large M/L suggest the cluster is DM-dominated down to <~ 0.005 r_vir. We observe a gas mass fraction = 0.139+/-0.004 at the limit of our observations, finding an upper limit to Omega_m <= 0.29+/-0.03 (abridged).

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.