Paper detail

Chandra Observation of the Cooling Flow Cluster Abell 2052

We present an analysis of the Chandra X-ray observation of Abell 2052, including large scale properties of the cluster as well as the central region which includes the bright radio source, 3C 317. We present temperature and abundance profiles using both projected and deprojected spectral analyses. The cluster shows the cooling flow signatures of excess surface brightness above a beta- model at the cluster center, and a temperature decline into the center of the cluster. The heavy element abundances initially increase into the center, but decline within 30 arcsec. Temperature and abundance maps show that the X-ray bright shells surrounding the radio source are the coolest and least abundant regions in the cluster. The mass-deposition rate in the cooling flow is 26 < Mdot < 42 Msun/yr. This rate is ~ a factor of three lower than the rates found with previous X-ray observatories. Based on a stellar population analysis using imaging and spectra at wavelengths spanning the far UV to the NIR, we find a star formation rate of 0.6 Msun/yr within a 3 arcsec radius of the nucleus of the central cluster galaxy. Total and gas mass profiles for the cluster are also determined. We investigate additional sources of pressure in the X-ray holes formed by the radio source, and limit the temperature of any hot, diffuse, thermal component which provides the bulk of the pressure in the holes to kT > 20 keV. We calculate the magnetic field in the bright-shell region and find B ~ 11 \muG. The current luminosity of the central AGN is L_X = 7.9 x 10^41 erg/s, and its spectrum is well-fitted by a power-law model with no excess absorption above the Galactic value. The energy output from several radio outbursts, occurring episodically over the lifetime of the cluster, may be sufficient to offset the cooling flow near the center. (Abridged)

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.