Paper detail

Chandra monitoring of the Galactic Centre magnetar SGR J1745-2900 during the initial 3.5 years of outburst decay

We report on 3.5 years of Chandra monitoring of the Galactic Centre magnetar SGR J1745-2900 since its outburst onset in April 2013. The magnetar spin-down has shown at least two episodes of period derivative increases so far, and it has slowed down regularly in the past year or so. We observed a slightly increasing trend in the time evolution of the pulsed fraction, up to about 55 per cent in the most recent observations. SGR J1745-2900 has not reached the quiescent level yet, and so far the overall outburst evolution can be interpreted in terms of a cooling hot region on the star surface. We discuss possible scenarios, showing in particular how the presence of a shrinking hot spot in this source is hardly reconcilable with internal crustal cooling and favors the untwisting bundle model for this outburst. Moreover, we also show how the emission from a single uniform hot spot is incompatible with the observed pulsed fraction evolution for any pair of viewing angles, suggesting an anisotropic emission pattern.

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.