Paper detail

Chandra measurement of the X-ray spectrum of a quasar at z=5.99

We report the first measurement of the X-ray spectrum of the z = 5.99 quasar SDSSp J130608.26+035626.3 from a 120 ks observation by the Chandra ACIS-S instrument. Between 0.5 and 7 keV, corresponding to 3.5--49 keV in the quasar rest frame, we find an energy index of 0.86 +/- 0.2, consistent with the typical indices found for radio quiet quasars at lower redshifts, and inconsistent with the index required to match the diffuse X-ray background. We have a weak indication of a redshifted Fe-K line. In comparing the counting rate between an earlier, short observation and the longer observation reported here, we find evidence for source variability at the 99.9% confidence level. We note that other nearby X-ray sources would bias the measured alpha_{ox} = 1.70 by -0.09 if the X-ray flux were determined from within a 60" extraction circle. Our results for the energy index and the alpha_{ox} are consistent with no strong evolution in the active galactic nucleus emission mechanism with redshift out to z ~ 6, and therefore with the picture that massive black holes have already formed less than 1 Gyr after the big bang.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.