Paper detail

ChaMAILeon: Exploring the Usability of a Privacy Preserving Email Sharing System

While passwords, by definition, are meant to be secret, recent trends have witnessed an increasing number of people sharing their email passwords with friends, colleagues, and significant others. However, leading websites like Google advise their users not to share their passwords with anyone, to avoid security and privacy breaches. To understand users' general password sharing behavior and practices, we conducted an online survey with 209 Indian participants and found that 64.35% of the participants felt a need to share their email passwords. Further, about 77% of the participants said that they would want to use a system which could provide them access control features, to maintain their privacy while sharing emails. To address the privacy concerns of users who need to share emails, we propose ChaMAILeon, a system which enables users to share their email passwords while maintaining their privacy. ChaMAILeon allows users to create multiple passwords for their email account. Each such password corresponds to a different set of access control rules, and gives a different view of the same email account. We conducted a controlled experiment with 30 participants to evaluate the usability of the system. Each participant was required to perform 5 tasks. Each task corresponded to different access control rules, which the participant was required to set, for a dummy email account. We found that, with a reasonable number of multiple attempts, all 30 participants were able to perform all 5 tasks given to them. The system usability score was found out to be 75.42. Moreover, 56.6% of the participants said that they would like to use ChaMAILeon frequently.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.