Paper detail

Challenges in Forming Planets by Gravitational Instability: Disk Irradiation and Clump Migration, Accretion & Tidal Destructio

We present two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of self-gravitating protostellar disks subject to axisymmetric infall from envelopes and irradiation from the central star, to explore disk fragmentation due to gravitational instability (GI), and the fragmented clump evolution. We assume that the disk is built gradually and smoothly by the infall, resulting in good numerical convergence. We confirm that for disks around solar-mass stars, infall at high rates at radii beyond ~50 AU leads to disk fragmentation. At lower infall rates <1e-5 Msun/yr, however, irradiation suppresses fragmentation. We find that, once formed, the fragments or clumps migrate inward on typical type-I time scales of ~2e3 yr initially, but later migration deviates from the type-I time scale when the clump becomes more massive than the local disk mass, and/or when they starts to open gaps. As they migrate, the clumps accrete from the disk at a rate 1e-3 to 1e-1 MJupiter/yr, consistent with analytic estimates that assume a 1-2 Hill radii cross section. Most clumps can grow to their isolation masses >0.1 Msun quickly. The eventual fates of these clumps, however, diverges depending on the migration speed: 3 out of 13 clumps become massive enough (brown dwarf mass) to open gaps in the disk and essentially stop migrating; 4 are tidally destroyed during inward migration; 6 migrate across the inner simulated disk boundary. A simple analytic model for clump evolution is derived to explain these different fates. Overall, our results indicate that fast migration, accretion, and tidal destruction of the clumps pose challenges to the scenario of giant planet formation by GI in situ, but may provide a formation mechanism for close binary systems.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.