Paper detail

Challenges in Developing Secure Mobile Health Applications, A Systematic Review

Mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) have gained significant popularity over the last few years due to its tremendous benefits, such as lowering healthcare cost and increasing patient awareness. However, the sensitivity of healthcare data makes the security of mHealth apps a serious concern. In this review, we aim to identify and analyse the reported challenges that the developers of mHealth apps face concerning security. Additionally, our study aimed to develop a conceptual framework with the challenges faced by mHealth apps development organization for developing secure apps. The knowledge of such challenges can help to reduce the risk of developing insecure mHealth apps. We followed the Systematic Literature Review method for this review. We selected studies that have been published between January 2008 and October 2020. We selected 32 primary studies using predefined criteria and used thematic analysis method for analysing the extracted data. We identified nine challenges that can affect the development of secure mHealth apps. Such as 1) lack of security guidelines and regulations for developing secure mHealth apps, 2) developers lack of knowledge and expertise for secure mHealth app development, 3) lack of stakeholders involvement during mHealth app development, etc . Based on our analysis, we have presented a conceptual framework which highlights the correlation between the identified challenges. We conclude that our findings can help them identify their weaknesses and improve their security practices. Similarly, mHealth apps developers can identify the challenges they face to develop mHealth apps that do not pose security risks for users. Our review is a step towards providing insights into the development of secure mHealth apps. Our proposed conceptual framework can act as a practice guideline for practitioners to enhance secure mHealth apps development.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.