Paper detail

CFORB: Circular FREAK-ORB Visual Odometry

We present a novel Visual Odometry algorithm entitled Circular FREAK-ORB (CFORB). This algorithm detects features using the well-known ORB algorithm [12] and computes feature descriptors using the FREAK algorithm [14]. CFORB is invariant to both rotation and scale changes, and is suitable for use in environments with uneven terrain. Two visual geometric constraints have been utilized in order to remove invalid feature descriptor matches. These constraints have not previously been utilized in a Visual Odometry algorithm. A variation to circular matching [16] has also been implemented. This allows features to be matched between images without having to be dependent upon the epipolar constraint. This algorithm has been run on the KITTI benchmark dataset and achieves a competitive average translational error of $3.73 \%$ and average rotational error of $0.0107 deg/m$. CFORB has also been run in an indoor environment and achieved an average translational error of $3.70 \%$. After running CFORB in a highly textured environment with an approximately uniform feature spread across the images, the algorithm achieves an average translational error of $2.4 \%$ and an average rotational error of $0.009 deg/m$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.