Paper detail

CFHTLenS: Improving the quality of photometric redshifts with precision photometry

Here we present the results of various approaches to measure accurate colours and photometric redshifts (photo-z's) from wide-field imaging data. We use data from the Canada-France-Hawaii-Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS) which have been re- processed by the CFHT Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) team in order to carry out a number of weak gravitational lensing studies. An emphasis is put on the correction of systematic effects in the photo-z's arising from the different Point Spread Functions (PSF) in the five optical bands. Different ways of correcting these effects are discussed and the resulting photo-z accuracies are quantified by comparing the photo-z's to large spectroscopic redshift (spec-z) data sets. Careful homogenisation of the PSF between bands leads to increased overall accuracy of photo-z's. The gain is particularly pronounced at fainter magnitudes where galaxies are smaller and flux measurements are affected more by PSF-effects. We also study possible re- calibrations of the photometric zeropoints (ZPs) with the help of galaxies with known spec-z's. We find that if PSF-effects are properly taken into account, a re-calibration of the ZPs becomes much less important suggesting that previous such re-calibrations described in the literature could in fact be mostly corrections for PSF-effects rather than corrections for real inaccuracies in the ZPs. The implications of this finding for future surveys like KiDS, DES, LSST, or Euclid are mixed. On the one hand, ZP re-calibrations with spec-z's might not be as accurate as previously thought. On the other hand, careful PSF homogenisation might provide a way out and yield accurate, homogeneous photometry without the need for full spectroscopic coverage. This is the first paper in a series describing the technical aspects of CFHTLenS. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access19 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.