Paper detail

Certification for mu-calculus with winning strategies

We define memory-efficient certificates for $μ$-calculus model checking problems based on the well-known correspondence of the $μ$-calculus model checking with winning certain parity games. Winning strategies can independently checked, in low polynomial time, by observing that there is no reachable strongly connected component in the graph of the parity game whose largest priority is odd. Winning strategies are computed by fixpoint iteration following the naive semantics of $μ$-calculus. We instrument the usual fixpoint iteration of $μ$-calculus model checking so that it produces evidence in the form of a winning strategy; these winning strategies can be computed in polynomial time in $|S|$ and in space $O(|S|^2 |ϕ|^2)$, where $|S|$ is the size of the state space and $|ϕ|$ the length of the formula $ϕ$\@. The main technical contribution here is the notion and algebra of partial winning strategies. On the technical level our work can be seen as a new, simpler, and immediate constructive proof of the correspondence between $μ$-calculus and parity games.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.