Paper detail

Cepheids under the magnifying glass -- not so simple, after all!

Classical Cepheids are blue loop stars that have famously been dubbed "magnifying glasses of stellar evolution" and have been studied for a long time. As more and more precise observations of Cepheids are secured over ever-increasing temporal baselines, our ignorance of the physics governing these crucial stars is becoming increasingly clear. Thus, it is time to turn up the magnification and investigate the limitations of our understanding of classical pulsators. Of course, classical Cepheids are also standard candles thanks to the Leavitt law that allows to measure distances in the nearby Universe. Nowadays, Cepheids serve as the backbone of a precisely calibrated distance ladder that allows to measure Hubble's constant (H0) to better than 2%, thus providing crucial constraints for precision cosmology. The recently established discord among H0 values measured in the late-time Universe and inferred from observations of the early Universe requires utmost diligence in estimating systematic uncertainties in order to strengthen the significance of the results. In this presentation I focus on two main aspects of recent Cepheid-related research. First, I present the Geneva Cepheid Radial Velocity survey (GE-CeRVS) and an update on the modulated spectroscopic variability exhibited by the 4 d Cepheid QZ Normae based on 8 years of monitoring. Then, I discuss some efforts directed towards a 1% H0 measurement needed for understanding the cosmological implications of discordant H0 values. Finally, I argue that now is a particularly opportune time to leverage the synergies between stellar physics and observational cosmology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.