Paper detail

Central Limit Theorems for Gaps of Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions

Zeckendorf proved that every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers $\{1,2,3,5,\dots\}$. This has been extended to many other recurrence relations $\{G_n\}$ (with their own notion of a legal decomposition) and to proving that the distribution of the number of summands of an $M \in [G_n, G_{n+1})$ converges to a Gaussian as $n\to\infty$. We prove that for any non-negative integer $g$ the average number of gaps of size $g$ in many generalized Zeckendorf decompositions is $C_μn+d_μ+o(1)$ for constants $C_μ> 0$ and $d_μ$ depending on $g$ and the recurrence, the variance of the number of gaps of size $g$ is similarly $C_σn + d_σ+ o(1)$ with $C_σ> 0$, and the number of gaps of size $g$ of an $M\in[G_n,G_{n+1})$ converges to a Gaussian as $n\to\infty$. The proof is by analysis of an associated two-dimensional recurrence; we prove a general result on when such behavior converges to a Gaussian, and additionally re-derive other results in the literature.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.