Paper detail

Central limit theorem related to MDR-method

In many medical and biological investigations, including genetics, it is typical to handle high dimensional data which can be viewed as a set of values of some factors and a binary response variable. For instance, the response variable can describe the state of a patient health and one often assumes that it depends only on some part of factors. An important problem is to determine collections of significant factors. In this regard we turn to the MDR-method introduced by M.Ritchie and coauthors. Our recent paper provided the necessary and sufficient conditions for strong consistency of estimates of the prediction error employing the K-fold cross-validation and an arbitrary penalty function. Here we introduce the regularized versions of the mentioned estimates and prove for them the multidimensional CLT. Statistical variants of the CLT involving self-normalization are discussed as well. Keywords and phrases: binary response variable, significant factors, penalty function, cross-validation, MDR-method, SLLN for arrays, strong consistency, regularized estimates, multidimensional CLT, self-normalization.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.